Home › Forums › General › General Board › ROV manufacturers—who is the most dependable
- This topic has 28 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 1 month ago by
flyingduck.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 30, 2007 at 7:27 am #12006
luckyjim37
ParticipantV true 😀
Has to be MRV 6 although it is only the LX version as opposed to MRV5 which is the GTI version but as with all sports cars becomes a little unrealiable 🙂
May 30, 2007 at 7:37 am #12007TheProphet
ParticipantLucky Jim are you another of these MRV expert’s 🙄
You won’t even remember when MRV 5 was a GTI version!
The techology in all the vehicles mentioned are slighgtly different,but it is like any other piece of equipment if you maintain it and look after it you will have increased reliability. 🙂
May 30, 2007 at 7:47 am #12008luckyjim37
ParticipantI never did see MRV 5 with its extra thrusters and power pack that is true. I am also well aware that the fibre mux systems are different on both vehicles however the differences I was refering to are the different frame sizes, The fact that MRV 5 has individually comp’d bearing housings, the pot housings are protected with a compensation system and in general it has a lot of the available extras that MRV’s had the option of.
MRV 6 is as the manual calls it the zero option version. Two vert thruster no lighting junction box, etc.
I never profess to be an expert but with the exception of one MRV I have found them to be reliable if you stay on top of the maintenance and keep at them at every opportunity.
However other people who I know have had horrendous multiple trips on the vehicles and these are guys who are good at what they do and stay on top of the maintenance.
May 30, 2007 at 8:04 am #12009TheProphet
ParticipantMRV 5 was a hybred vehicle and is totally differnt from the earlier and later MRV’s.
It was originally built for pipeline work in Norway for Geoconsult in the late 90’s.The pot housings are a retro fit mod that can be fitted to any MRV or even the Spartan’s and Olympians that Fugro use. 🙂
As far as horrendous trips go i think we have all had one of those sometime in our working life 🙂
May 30, 2007 at 9:41 am #12010FreddyB
ParticipantOne of the guys here compared ROV manufacturers to car makers:
– Perry are like Ford or GM – mass produced, simple
– Schilling are BMW. Mercedes, Audi – complex, engineering driven, expensive– SMD like to think they are Jaguar or Aston Martin but wind up more like British Leyland !
May 30, 2007 at 1:29 pm #12011luckyjim37
ParticipantI think everyone has a bad trip now and again. I was on a rig with an MRV when MRV 5 was on another rig very close by and for months had an horrific amount of down time.
When I worked on it off a vessel in the dutch sector it performed very well and I even enjoyed assisting with the pot housing mod being fitted to the vehicle.s
To say it is totally different is stretching it a little.
MRV 8 is almost identical in its set up with the exception of the fibre optics which is now apparently also being changed due to the fibre optic system now no longer being manufactured.
5 used to have a third pod which was removed when the fibre upgrade was fitted.
So in reality it is now a virtually standard MRV. When I initially mentioned the vehicle on here I was attempting to be sarcastic as 90 per cent of people I have worked with on them do not like them very much.
The vehicles are either loved or hated. I have not heard many people sit on the fence about them at all.
May 30, 2007 at 2:02 pm #12012ROV_VALLEY_COMMANDO
ParticipantProphet,
Correct me if i’m wrong but i don’t remember MRV5 being built for GeoConsult, Fugro GeoTeam maybe, Ray can you clarify?
May 30, 2007 at 2:44 pm #12013TheProphet
Participantcommando
I think your right about that it was GeoTeam my mistake old age i’m afraid to say. 😆
May 30, 2007 at 5:12 pm #12014truered
Participantgeoteam! northsea surveyor. back when it flew straight lines with turbos
May 30, 2007 at 8:47 pm #12015ROV_VALLEY_COMMANDO
ParticipantShould never have got rid of the turbo pack, only good thing about it, still has the switch on the console which is cool (well it did a couple of years ago).
June 1, 2007 at 11:02 am #12016Martin Wareham
ParticipantI’ve got some pictures of MRV5 with the turbo thrusters on it if anyone’s interested; on sea trials around Bergen (I think it was Bergen it’s been a while :wink:).
It did look pretty cool and went well too; nothing like it for pipeline survey in its day.
June 1, 2007 at 6:35 pm #12017Ray Shields
ParticipantYeah Ive still got loads of photos and video.
The additional 100HP power pack was taken off without any consultation with the people who used the vehicle. At the time the reason given was that the system needed too much electrical power to run it.
I did point out afterwards that if the vessel couldnt supply the power then all we had to do was not switch on the second pack! It was a shame to lose 100HP, all it saved was 25cm off the back of the sub as well.
It is now running with a multimode 903 mux for all of its comms, unfortunately it now only has the 4 video channels instead of the ELEVEN we had originally (the survey cameras were true SVHS, 2 channels per camera plus 2 channels for Seabat heads).
A lot of the problems we had at the start in Egypt was due to the LARS and TMS – they came off another system that had been in Far East for 2 years with zero maintenance. The sub also had never been in the water since the buoyancy upgrade, never had the TMS fitted onto it etc. until we went onto the rig – never a good time to do all of this and expect it all to work (which it didnt)
Off Libya just now with it. I was in Tripoli last Saturday night on the way out and met up with 2 boys who were motorbiking from John o Groats to Cape Town, chatted with them for half an hour or so and then had a photo taken with them.
It was Ewan Mgregor and Charley Borneman, they were filming the new series, Long Way Down!
June 1, 2007 at 8:38 pm #12018Cowboy
ParticipantRay Shields~ MRV 5 encyclopedia on legs lol!!
Nice one on the McGregor and Boorman meet Ray, were they as heavily supported as they were on "Long way round"? Been watching te repeats here in Alexandria on Dubai TV
Did I tell you I’d bought a new bike to replace the smashed one? Yamaha YZF-R1. Yay!June 1, 2007 at 9:51 pm #12019flyingduck
ParticipantWait a minute guys, dont lead the original question astray by mentioning the MRV5. Help ma bob!
And, I disagree with Ford being like Perry. Perry is the best. Simple: Yes, Reliable: Yes, Mass produced: Probably. (Good for spare parts). Never see milky water. Handy drawer for extra bits and bobs. Plently of survey channels; 110v and 24v. Plently of sloenoids with Aux system on and with a couple of proportional valves for grinder, torque tool etc. And, the XLX is equipped with DP so you can have a coffee at the same time as being on the hot seat. Perry is more like Mercedes.
The Quests are more like the latest James Bond car that nobody can figure out how to work because were pilot techs and not 007’s.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.