Home Forums General General Board Wow! – US Customs and Border Protection (CBP)

Wow! – US Customs and Border Protection (CBP)

Home Forums General General Board Wow! – US Customs and Border Protection (CBP)

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #2976
    James McLauchlan
    Participant

    It is a time of waiting for the offshore oil and gas industry as the US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) considers the comments they have received about proposed modification of rulings related to the Jones Act.

    In a nutshell it looks as if some international vessel operators may be in for a shock if the CBP in the USA have their way on modifications, interpretation and intended enforcement of the Jones act.

    This is in regard to international vessels operating intercoastal (coast to coast) within US waters. Particular impact would be felt by non US flagged vessels.
    It appears the CBP may have initially short changed the offshore industry by not giving sufficient time for the required adjustments to take effect.(i.e. build more American boats to plug the gaps as the foreign boats are banned from operating).
    In the longer term (reading between the lines) within about 5 years it will only be US flagged vessels working the the US oil an gas industry

    The upshot is that those trips to the GOM (or any other US controlled patch of water) on well known foreign flagged DP Diving/ROV support boats will be dying out during that period.
    You can pretty much assume that those new US boats will be manned by newly trained US citizens. Job creation all round.

    In one sense it’s nice to see a country protecting it’s own.
    In another sense it’s not so cool, as offshore international work opportunities will most likely start getting thinner on the ground as a result of this.

    More on this: HERE

    #24897
    doug
    Participant

    Hi , this has been withdrawn for now by the CBP when the oil companies and congress all figured out the US did not have actual vessels that could keep the oil flowing , new field installations , capability for umbilcal lay , deep water cranes , winches etc etc.
    My understanding is that companies like Chouest were very pro the removal of foreign vessels ( of course) but did not have the vessels themselves to do it.
    Hats off to IMCA for really being pro active with this and in particular Hugh Williams who lobbied hard on the subject for Subsea contractors.
    See the link attached and " if you have time "to read all responses and reasoning , it is good reading!

    http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/admin/fl/foia/elec_read_room/jones_act/

    Brodie

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.

Skip to toolbar